This morning’s Windows Phone 7 Launch Event, whileÂ appearingÂ in a somewhat subdued fashion,Â ended onÂ such aÂ very high note that I considered the launch a rousing succcess!Â Â
The lack of an impressive Microsoft presence in the Windows Mobile field over the last few years has kept the fanboys and girls from becoming overly excited at the event, like Apple fanboys are with just about any Steve Jobs announcement.Â Â Heck, even Antenna-gateÂ showed a lot more Apple fan enthusiasm than this launch event.Â Â However, I really think that Windows Phone 7 is such a different OS that it will quickly gain mindshare with consumersÂ who have yet to purchase an iPhone.Â Â It *may* even convert a few existing iPhone/iPod users.
I also appreciated Steve Ballmer’s enthusiasm, and Ralph de la Vega provided some very interesting details on AT&T’s future device line-up!
Joe’s presentation, with all the demos and live interaction was a complete joy to watch.Â Â I especially enjoyed watching his bravery and true faith in taking a second shot at connecting to the Tell Me servers to complete his online search for Alaskan Airlines flight number 7.Â VERY IMPRESSIVE.
In all honesty,Â I canÂ truly say that I cannot wait until November 8 to get a new Windows Phone 7 device!
Net Neutrality is a very confusing subject, mostly because it means different things to different people.Â Â
At the heart of the whole debate is whether a company who has the responsibility of providing the internet infrastructure (or the “Internet Backbone”) has the right to sell higher speed access to the backbone to those client companies that might want their website to display faster.
There are two ways to look at the this situation, in more or less black and white terms.Â Â Unfortunately, this is anything but a black and white situation, so I admit that this breakdown of terms will be rather simplistic.Â Here is the nutshell version of each:
- If you are for the continued lack of regulation of the Internet, and opt for more of aÂ laissez-faire angle, then you are considered to be AGAINST Net Neutrality.Â Â You join the ranks of large companies like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, etc.Â Â Just recently, Google has announced a desire to work with Verizon, so they are now changing sides.
- If you vote to regulate the Internet, then you are FOR Net Neutrality.Â You join the ranks of groups like Free Press, Public Knowledge, Amazon, and Yahoo.Â Google used to be on this side, but because they are now in talks with Verizon Wireless about a bundling deal, they have concievably changed sides…
People who are AGAINST Net Neutrality want to be able to sell the Googles of the worldÂ a far superior connection to the Internet compared to the small business websites.Â Â The major argument here is that allowing these backbone companies to charge more for faster connections gives these companies theÂ necessaryÂ incentives to continue to invest in their own networks and infrastructure.
People who are FOR Net Neutrality want the Amazons of the world to have the same visibility on the Internet thatÂ the average Small BusinessÂ website has.Â Â They say that regulations to prevent (or at least restrict) any possible discrimination are required to keep the big businesses of the world from conspiring to limit options of regular users.
For a really good list of articlesÂ on the issue, please visit the New York Times Room for Debate topic of “Who Gets Priority on the Web?”Â There are articles from 9 different Contributors available for your perusal, so you’ll get both sides of the story.Â Highly recommended read.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) won a critical exemption to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention provisions on Monday July 26th. This exemption provides new legal protections for consumers who modify their cell phones in order to make them more operable for their own personal use. Previously, these actions could have been used as grounds to sue them for their non-infringing or fair use activities.
Read onward after the break to see the rest of the article!
Today begins my first day at the eNOC (Enterprise Network Operations Center) IPAG (short for Internet Protocol AGgregation) group. Training should last approximately 5 to 6 weeks, and consist of some deep-dive topics relating to Ethernet switching. The good news is that Iâ€™ll be joining my good friend Edgar (who accepted a position on the â€œfirstâ€ wave – Iâ€™m on the second wave), and my original CMAC manager Kelly will be joining us as well!